40,2601$% 0.13
46,7458€% 0.13
53,9601£% 0.23
4.316,24%0,46
3.337,10%0,40
10.198,76%-0,26
10 Temmuz 2025 Perşembe
On January 27, Ekrem İmamoğlu held a press conference at the historic Saraçhane district, where he vehemently criticized ongoing investigations targeting him. During this event, he accused investigators of repeatedly appointing the same expert, suggesting a pattern of biased judicial procedures. His outspoken remarks drew significant attention and sparked further legal scrutiny.
Following his statements, an indictment was formally filed against İmamoğlu. He faces charges of ‘Attempting to improperly influence expert witnesses and interfere with the fairness of judicial proceedings.’ If convicted, he could face up to four years of imprisonment. The case underscores the contentious political and legal battles involving the prominent politician.
İmamoğlu did not attend the first scheduled hearing at the Istanbul 2nd Criminal Court of First Instance. His absence was a protest against the recent transfer of the trial from the Çağlayan Courthouse to Silivri Prison, a move viewed by supporters as an attempt to intimidate him. Additionally, the CHP Istanbul Provincial Chairman, Özgür Çelik, announced the cancellation of planned rally support, citing concerns over judicial bias.
The court proceedings, which İmamoğlu and his legal team boycotted, resulted in the case being postponed to Friday, September 26. This postponement allows further legal preparations and underscores ongoing tensions between political figures and judicial authorities.
Previously, İmamoğlu was detained on March 23, on allegations related to corruption charges. His detention marked a significant escalation in the legal challenges he has faced, fueling debates over judicial independence and political influence.
During the press conference, İmamoğlu sharply criticized the integrity of the expert witnesses involved in his cases, alleging bias and manipulation. He remarked, “I am calling upon the Minister of Justice. Our press conference is named after the president, inspired by his influence. We titled it ‘The Bigger Turnip’ to highlight the absurdity of the situation. I will reveal how false reports found their way into the indictment, and how unsigned, baseless reports are used to unjustly accuse individuals— backed by questionable documents.”
He accused certain expert reports, which initially favored him, of being overturned after the involvement of a single expert, suggesting deliberate misconduct. İmamoğlu pointed out that specific experts are consistently appointed in cases against him, implying a coordinated effort to undermine his reputation and legal standing.
The Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office promptly launched an investigation into İmamoğlu’s public remarks. Authorities alleged that he publicly targeted and discredited the expert responsible for some investigations and cases, aiming to influence judicial outcomes in favor of certain suspects.
This article was created, translated, and reviewed with the support of artificial intelligence by an editor or author. For more details, refer to our Terms and Conditions.