DOLAR

40,2601$% 0.13

EURO

46,7458% 0.13

STERLİN

53,9601£% 0.23

GRAM ALTIN

4.316,24%0,46

ONS

3.337,10%0,40

BİST100

10.198,76%-0,26

Sabah Vakti a 02:00
Samsun KAPALI 30°
  • Adana
  • Adıyaman
  • Afyonkarahisar
  • Ağrı
  • Amasya
  • Ankara
  • Antalya
  • Artvin
  • Aydın
  • Balıkesir
  • Bilecik
  • Bingöl
  • Bitlis
  • Bolu
  • Burdur
  • Bursa
  • Çanakkale
  • Çankırı
  • Çorum
  • Denizli
  • Diyarbakır
  • Edirne
  • Elazığ
  • Erzincan
  • Erzurum
  • Eskişehir
  • Gaziantep
  • Giresun
  • Gümüşhane
  • Hakkâri
  • Hatay
  • Isparta
  • Mersin
  • istanbul
  • izmir
  • Kars
  • Kastamonu
  • Kayseri
  • Kırklareli
  • Kırşehir
  • Kocaeli
  • Konya
  • Kütahya
  • Malatya
  • Manisa
  • Kahramanmaraş
  • Mardin
  • Muğla
  • Muş
  • Nevşehir
  • Niğde
  • Ordu
  • Rize
  • Sakarya
  • Samsun
  • Siirt
  • Sinop
  • Sivas
  • Tekirdağ
  • Tokat
  • Trabzon
  • Tunceli
  • Şanlıurfa
  • Uşak
  • Van
  • Yozgat
  • Zonguldak
  • Aksaray
  • Bayburt
  • Karaman
  • Kırıkkale
  • Batman
  • Şırnak
  • Bartın
  • Ardahan
  • Iğdır
  • Yalova
  • Karabük
  • Kilis
  • Osmaniye
  • Düzce
a
Haber Editor

Haber Editor

10 Temmuz 2025 Perşembe

DİĞER YAZARLARIMIZ

Imamoğlu’s Expert Witness Case Postponed to September 26 – Vezir Agency

Imamoğlu’s Expert Witness Case Postponed to September 26 – Vezir Agency
0

BEĞENDİM

ABONE OL

Overview of the Case Against Ekrem İmamoğlu

On January 27, Ekrem İmamoğlu held a press conference at the historic Saraçhane district, where he vehemently criticized ongoing investigations targeting him. During this event, he accused investigators of repeatedly appointing the same expert, suggesting a pattern of biased judicial procedures. His outspoken remarks drew significant attention and sparked further legal scrutiny.

The Indictment and Charges

Following his statements, an indictment was formally filed against İmamoğlu. He faces charges of ‘Attempting to improperly influence expert witnesses and interfere with the fairness of judicial proceedings.’ If convicted, he could face up to four years of imprisonment. The case underscores the contentious political and legal battles involving the prominent politician.

Absence from the Initial Hearing

İmamoğlu did not attend the first scheduled hearing at the Istanbul 2nd Criminal Court of First Instance. His absence was a protest against the recent transfer of the trial from the Çağlayan Courthouse to Silivri Prison, a move viewed by supporters as an attempt to intimidate him. Additionally, the CHP Istanbul Provincial Chairman, Özgür Çelik, announced the cancellation of planned rally support, citing concerns over judicial bias.

Hearing Details and Next Steps

The court proceedings, which İmamoğlu and his legal team boycotted, resulted in the case being postponed to Friday, September 26. This postponement allows further legal preparations and underscores ongoing tensions between political figures and judicial authorities.

Background: The March 23 Detention

Previously, İmamoğlu was detained on March 23, on allegations related to corruption charges. His detention marked a significant escalation in the legal challenges he has faced, fueling debates over judicial independence and political influence.

Details of the Controversy

During the press conference, İmamoğlu sharply criticized the integrity of the expert witnesses involved in his cases, alleging bias and manipulation. He remarked, “I am calling upon the Minister of Justice. Our press conference is named after the president, inspired by his influence. We titled it ‘The Bigger Turnip’ to highlight the absurdity of the situation. I will reveal how false reports found their way into the indictment, and how unsigned, baseless reports are used to unjustly accuse individuals— backed by questionable documents.”

He accused certain expert reports, which initially favored him, of being overturned after the involvement of a single expert, suggesting deliberate misconduct. İmamoğlu pointed out that specific experts are consistently appointed in cases against him, implying a coordinated effort to undermine his reputation and legal standing.

Government Response and Investigation

The Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office promptly launched an investigation into İmamoğlu’s public remarks. Authorities alleged that he publicly targeted and discredited the expert responsible for some investigations and cases, aiming to influence judicial outcomes in favor of certain suspects.

Reactions and Media Coverage

  • Suat Toktaş, the director of Halk TV, was detained for releasing a phone conversation with the expert witness without authorization, revealing sensitive information and the witness’s identity.
  • Other journalists and media figures, including Serhan Asker, Seda Selek, Barış Pehlivan, and Kürşad Oğuz, were released under judicial supervision, highlighting the ongoing media implications of the case.

This article was created, translated, and reviewed with the support of artificial intelligence by an editor or author. For more details, refer to our Terms and Conditions.