Judge Transfers Control of Los Angeles National Guard to State Authorities

BEĞENDİM

ABONE OL

News

0

Legal Decision Blocks Trump’s Military Deployment in San Francisco

In a landmark ruling by the Southern District Court of San Francisco, Senior Judge Charles Breyer delivered a decisive judgment against the Trump administration’s attempt to deploy troops within the city. The court mandated that the National Guard units, previously under federal control, be immediately returned to the authority of California’s Democratic Governor, Gavin Newsom.

Judge Breyer emphasized that the federal government’s actions were illegal and procedurally flawed, asserting that the administration illegally seized control of the troops. His decision underscores the importance of adhering to established legal protocols and sets a significant precedent that limits future unilateral military interventions in domestic settings by federal authorities. The ruling specifically states that the move by President Trump’s administration compromised the constitutional separation of powers and violated federal law.

In his remarks, Judge Breyer warned that such actions could set a dangerous precedent for future domestic military operations, potentially eroding civil liberties and state authority. He ordered that the troops be placed back under California’s military command, with Governor Newsom affirming the court’s decision as a victory for democratic principles and state sovereignty.

Governor Newsom’s Response and Future Legal Actions

Following the court’s verdict, Governor Gavin Newsom expressed his satisfaction, stating at a press briefing, “This was a true test of our democratic institutions, and I am proud to say we passed it.” He announced that the National Guard units would be returning to his command, resuming their previous duties under state jurisdiction. Newsom emphasized the importance of maintaining control over state resources and safeguarding the rights of local governments against federal overreach.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration announced its intention to appeal the decision. The case has been temporarily halted pending review by the U.S. Court of Appeals, which has agreed to stay the enforcement of the ruling. This legal process keeps the deployment in limbo, with the possibility of an expedited appeal to the Supreme Court, which is currently under Republican control, potentially reversing the decision.

Protests and Deployment of Federal Forces in Los Angeles

Parallel to the legal dispute, tensions escalated in Los Angeles during protests in support of undocumented immigrants detained by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Demonstrators gathered in large numbers, expressing their outrage, which at times led to clashes with security personnel. Several protesters were detained, and confrontations between civilians and law enforcement officers occurred sporadically.

In response, President Trump authorized the deployment of National Guard troops to maintain order. The U.S. Department of Defense took swift action, mobilizing approximately 4,000 National Guard personnel in the region. Additionally, Secretary Hegseth announced that around 700 Marines would be dispatched to Los Angeles, citing “heightened threats”.

During a Senate hearing on the Department’s 2026 budget, Hegseth defended the deployment, asserting that sending the troops was “constitutionally compliant and legally justified”. He emphasized that the presence of military forces was essential to restore order and ensure public safety amid ongoing unrest.

This article was generated, translated, and reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence, supported by a professional editor. For further details, please refer to our Terms and Conditions. Vezir Agency